- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:37:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12794 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2012-01-13 20:37:48 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Just put the description in the embed. There's no reason this has to be complicated. The issue relating to the poster hasn't been documented. Or at least, I've never seen any compelling description of why anyone would care. It's like asking for a description of an icon instead of asking what the icon means. The only times I've seen anyone asking for this is when misguided accessibility advocates have suggested it, in what I can only assume is a cargo-cult approach to making the Web accessible to people who can't see everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 20:38:00 UTC