- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:54:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15556
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #2 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2012-02-06 23:54:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Rationale: Assuming you mean section 16.10, this is incorrect per the relevant
> RFC.
I said 12.6 and meant it. See URI:
<http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#web-scheme-prefix>
The text says:
"References
W3C"
I agree that RFC 4395 wants a "References" entry, but it's described as
Include full citations for all referenced documents. Registration
templates for provisional registration may be included in an
Internet Draft; when the documents expire or are approved for
publication as an RFC, the registration will be updated.
I don't see how saying "W3C" addresses this.
The right thing to put here is the definition of the scheme (if there was one;
but that's a separate issue).
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 23:57:17 UTC