W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 13201] Flow content should be allowed in <dt>

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:57:49 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R9Oc1-0006o7-03@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #9 from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru> 2011-09-29 21:57:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)

> So the question really is whether multi-paragraph <dt>s are more or less common
> than authors confusing <dt>s and <dd>s when they intend to have flow content in
> their <dd>s and not their <dt>s.

Is it more or less common than confusing one HTML element with another? HEAD
with BODY? TABLE with TR and TD? One language with another? Bus with car? Apple
with orange?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 21:57:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:04 UTC