W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 13943] The "bad cue" handling is stricter than it should be

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:55:31 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R5mkN-0007VQ-LF@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #8 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-09-19 22:55:31 UTC ---
Oh, I misunderstood what you were asking for. You just want to keep looking for
a line with the --> marker or a blank line, instead of only allowing the -->
marker in the first or second line of a cue?

I don't really understand what authoring mistake is going to end up with that
being necessary. Why do you think multiple IDs is a likely error? Surely most
authors wouldn't provide any IDs at all.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 22:55:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:03 UTC