W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 14029] normative reference to specification whose author/editor is undisclosed

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:06:47 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R11ux-0005SE-BE@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #30 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> 2011-09-06 20:06:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Glenn, I agree that the IPR concerns here are important; I'm not enough of an
> expert on the details of the W3C patent policy to comment on them in general. 
> But what I don't understand is why they would disappear or be alleviated if the
> spec had a co-editor...  I would really appreciate a clarification on that.

because I can exercise habeas corpus on the identified co-editor, but not the
pseudonymous entity, or barring something that drastic, i can ask that
identified co-editor a question

i don't care to communicate with a pseudonymous person, since i presume they
are hiding something, and will not respond in good faith

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 20:06:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:03 UTC