- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:06:47 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14029 --- Comment #30 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> 2011-09-06 20:06:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > Glenn, I agree that the IPR concerns here are important; I'm not enough of an > expert on the details of the W3C patent policy to comment on them in general. > But what I don't understand is why they would disappear or be alleviated if the > spec had a co-editor... I would really appreciate a clarification on that. because I can exercise habeas corpus on the identified co-editor, but not the pseudonymous entity, or barring something that drastic, i can ask that identified co-editor a question i don't care to communicate with a pseudonymous person, since i presume they are hiding something, and will not respond in good faith -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 20:06:53 UTC