W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 14029] normative reference to specification whose author/editor is undisclosed

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:19:36 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R0TSy-0001mP-SO@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14029

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |julian.reschke@gmx.de

--- Comment #4 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2011-09-05 07:19:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is not a frivolous or invalid issue. HTML5 *is* a W3C spec, and it
> normatively mandates support for DOMPARSING in Section 2.2.1:
> 
> "In addition, user agents must implement the features defined in the DOM Range,
> DOM Parsing and Serialization, HTML Editing APIs, and UndoManager and DOM
> Transaction specifications that apply to their conformance class. [DOMRANGE]
> [DOMPARSING] [EDITING] [UNDO]"
> 
> Therefore, the W3C Patent Policy *does* apply to DOMPARSING by inclusion. If
> HTML5 did not normatively mandate support for DOMPARSING, then I agree this
> would not be an issue. However, it does, and it is.
> 
> If you don't care to treat this as an issue, then please consider this a
> request to elevate to HTML working group issue.

Glenn, you can do this by adding the "TrackerRequest" keyword.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 07:19:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:03 UTC