W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 14029] normative reference to specification whose author/editor is undisclosed

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 21:48:39 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R0KYR-00039i-Ta@jessica.w3.org>

Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> 2011-09-04 21:48:38 UTC ---

This is not a frivolous or invalid issue. HTML5 *is* a W3C spec, and it
normatively mandates support for DOMPARSING in Section 2.2.1:

"In addition, user agents must implement the features defined in the DOM Range,
DOM Parsing and Serialization, HTML Editing APIs, and UndoManager and DOM
Transaction specifications that apply to their conformance class. [DOMRANGE]

Therefore, the W3C Patent Policy *does* apply to DOMPARSING by inclusion. If
HTML5 did not normatively mandate support for DOMPARSING, then I agree this
would not be an issue. However, it does, and it is.

If you don't care to treat this as an issue, then please consider this a
request to elevate to HTML working group issue.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 4 September 2011 21:48:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:03 UTC