- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:45:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-09-03 19:45:14 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: I concurr with Simon. In fact, I'd go even further. It's far more
likely that an author who has a single <dl> with first a <dd> and then a <dt>
has accidentally typoed the element names and meant for the <dd> to be a <dt>
and the <dt> to be a <dd>. As such, it's our responsibility to make it easy for
validators to catch this.
(In reply to comment #2)
>
> Usecase is, for example, product title and its image and/or description in
> product list (in online shops, on manufacturer's website, etc.). Such items are
> often marked-up as DLs, while title of a product is often placed at the bottom
> of the item, not at the top.
I would recommend using <figure> for this.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 19:45:16 UTC