W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 13995] Don't check Content-Type for <track>

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:46:45 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Qz9TZ-0002F8-UE@jessica.w3.org>

Frank Olivier <franko@microsoft.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |franko@microsoft.com

--- Comment #2 from Frank Olivier <franko@microsoft.com> 2011-09-01 15:46:44 UTC ---
> WebVTT already has the WEBVTT header magic to differentiate it from other
> formats if we should ever support such in <track>.

...but this requires the user agent to download the file to check the track
type; this is not a good solution, especially in mobile scenarios.

> The main consequence of doing this check is that <track> will appear broken to
> all authors when they first test it. Even if they figure out how to set
> Content-Type, it'll mostly be a waste of time and not provide any real
> benefits.

I don't think that this is a big burden on developers; they use documentation
and samples when using new elements. This would just have to be documented
clearly, like a lot of other parts of the HTML5 spec.

The real benefit is that multiple track formats are supported cleanly.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2011 15:46:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:02:03 UTC