W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 12776] New: Define process for deciding whether a draft is REC-track or Note-track

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:05:45 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-12776-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12776

           Summary: Define process for deciding whether a draft is
                    REC-track or Note-track
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: working group Decision Policy
        AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
        ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com,
                    rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org


Whether a Working Draft eventually becomes a WG Note or proceeds down the REC
track is a decision of the Working Group. We should define a process for the WG
to do so. A likely outline would be:

- Starts with a bug report. If no one objects to the proposed change, then the
matter can be resolved without taking it to the full WG.
- If anyone objects, then we will ask proponents of both REC-track and
Note-track to provide rationale.
- We will likely use a more lightweight approach, such as a survey similar to
the one used for Last Call, rather than the full Decision Policy, since this is
a process question, not a technical question.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 08:05:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:10 UTC