[Bug 11775] Hello, I'm just writing a quick note to question the non-inclusion of the "feed" link type (rel="feed") which I remember coming across a few months ago. When I originally saw the new rel type, I was very glad to see that there was finally a way to specify

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11775

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-05-03 20:13:50 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: see comment 2; it was in the spec for a while and didn't get
adoption.

Note though that you can still register rel=feed as a keyword, and try to get
it used and implemented. If successful, it'll result in the spec being updated
again to have it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 20:13:53 UTC