- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:49:26 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13062
Daniel.S <crazy-daniel@gmx.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |crazy-daniel@gmx.de
--- Comment #3 from Daniel.S <crazy-daniel@gmx.de> 2011-06-26 16:49:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Another example:
>
> <dl>
> <div>
> <dt>Example</dt>
> <dd>Lorem ipsum</dd>
> </div>
> </dl>
>
> Here, DL is not _direct_ parent of DT/DD, but _is_ first _structural_ parent of
> DT/DD, so the code is perfectly OK.
One reason why we (authors) want and need a definition group element (<di>). It
works almost everywhere already and we wouldn't have to wait another 10 years
to have fitting pseudo elements defined in CSS.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2011 16:49:28 UTC