[Bug 9213] HTML5 Lacks a Way to Programmatically-Determine Missing Text Alternatives

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9213

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |LATER
         AssignedTo|ian@hixie.ch                |contributor@whatwg.org
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-06-13 23:43:33 UTC ---
Before it would be reasonable to deploy something like this in HTML proper, we
should first determine whether this is something that authors are likely to
actually use.

I would recommend defining a class name, e.g. "alt-missing-intentionally", that
could be handled in the way described above, and then encouraging people who
need this feature to use that for now. If it takes off, then it would make
sense to anoint it in the spec.

EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Partially Accepted
Change Description: none yet
Rationale: I have marked this LATER so that we can look at this again once
people have had a chance to demonstrate the authoring demand for this feature.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 23:43:37 UTC