- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:29:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12935 --- Comment #9 from fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net> 2011-06-13 16:29:52 UTC --- I can't say I'm too familiar with the way HTML parsing works, but I would assume: - We won't need any markup beyond what's in XHTML Ruby Annotation - We're likely to need <rb> and <rtc>, if not now, then at some point in the future. <rbc> seems mostly useless to me, but could be kept around for compat with XHTML Ruby Annotation markup. Wrt mixing other elements and ruby, I've heard it suggested for e.g. Chinese to mark up an entire paragraph with phonetics by placing the entire paragraph inside <ruby>. If you want to support that, then you don't actually want to have <rt> auto-close a <b>. My uninformed opinion is that you should have any ruby markup's closing tag auto-close anything that was opened inside it. I don't think we need to support mis-nested tags here. In an ideal world I would have: * <rt> autoclose <rt>, <rb>, <rp>, <rbc> * <rb> autoclose <rt>, <rb>, <rp>, <rtc> * <rp> autoclose <rt>, <rb>, <rp>, <rbc> * <rtc> autoclose <rt>, <rb>, <rp>, <rtc>, <rbc> * <rbc> autoclose <rt>, <rp>, <rtc>, <rbc> * Any ruby closing tag (including an autoclose) close anything opened inside that element -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 16:29:59 UTC