- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:58:51 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12885
VolkerK <volker.krebs@abas.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |volker.krebs@abas.de
--- Comment #19 from VolkerK <volker.krebs@abas.de> 2011-06-08 09:58:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > I agree with comment 11, but I'm not sure that it's relevant to this bug? Or
> > are you suggesting that type=number solves the relevant use cases?
>
> No. I'm suggesting that we shouldn't try to address i18n sadness of type=number
> by introducing other types. There may be other reasons to introduce new types.
I think that allowing the pattern attribute for type=number is a good idea. The
specification should not define what a valid floating point number is, like it
does here
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/common-microsyntaxes.html#valid-floating-point-number
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 09:58:53 UTC