W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2011

[Bug 13480] Add definition of "child nodes" term

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 07:10:40 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QnQAa-0007dV-OU@jessica.w3.org>

Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

--- Comment #4 from Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> 2011-07-31 07:10:39 UTC ---
In section 4.2.6 The style element in description of scoped attribute:

"If the scoped attribute is present, then the user agent must apply the
specified style information only to the style element's parent element (if
any), and that element's *child nodes*. Otherwise, the specified styles must,
if applied, be applied to the entire document."

I think that logical would be to apply scoped style to its parent element and
all parent's descendants, not only childs. So either description of scope is
wrong or I don't understand how it works. This probably make me think that
usage of child/direct child is wrong in the spec.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 31 July 2011 07:10:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:56 UTC