- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:57:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13333 --- Comment #42 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2011-07-29 16:57:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) > (1) the resolution fails to address the bug, which is that video/audio elements > do not support param children (while object does); the issue of whether source > should also support param children is incidental as noted in the original > submission; <embed> uses attributes. <object> only uses <param>, because it wasn't possible to make arbitrary attributes allowed in a DTD. We aren't using DTDs anymore, so the only reason for the <param> design to continue to exist is that object already uses <param>. > (2) the resolution is based in part on the invalid claim that a technical > change that affects parsing is not permissible because "it is treated as a void > [empty] element in shipped versions of all the major general-purpose browsers"; > this is entirely irrelevant, and probably not true either It is true and the truth is easily experimentally verifiable. (I experimentally verified it today.) > (3) the resolution assumes the bug is intended to be used "to mint > vendor-proprietary attributes", which is not the case; It's intended to mint vendor-proprietary name-value pair parameters, AFAICT. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 July 2011 16:57:26 UTC