- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:49:58 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13333 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #40 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2011-07-29 14:49:57 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: This bug report requests the HTML spec to provide <param name=foo value=bar> children for <source> as a mechanism for special-purpose browsers to attach name-value parameters to the <source> element. <source> element is treated as a void element in shipped versions of all the five major general-purpose browsers. Void elements can't have children, so this bug report is asking for an HTML parser change. HTML already provides a way to attach name-value pairs to an element: attributes. HTML also provides guidance on how to mint vendor-proprietary attributes: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#extensibility Therefore, the general problem of attaching proprietary name-value pairs to the <source> element is WORKSFORME and the specific solution of introducing <param> children to <source> is WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 July 2011 14:49:59 UTC