- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:34:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13333 --- Comment #31 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2011-07-27 22:34:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #25) > > you have failed to offer a viable alternative to this proposal, all you have > offered either doesn't work or violates some prohibition or convention; just to > review, you have said: > > * use data-* > * use non-standard attributes in HTML syntax > * use object > * use JS parameters to non-standard JS interfaces No, I have pointed to http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#extensibility which tells you how to extend in a standard way. You're trying to introduce another means of extensibility which is simply not necessary. http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#extensibility in particular mentions that you can do proprietary attributes by using "x-*" named attributes. So, why don't you just use "x-param" if that's what you need? Incidentally, anything that is just implemented and implementable by a subpart of browsers is proprietary. The kind of DRM schemes that you are thinking about probably rely on having closed source code and therefore cannot be implemented for example in Firefox. Thus, it's proprietary. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 22:34:26 UTC