- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:02:41 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13267 --- Comment #2 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2011-07-15 20:02:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Specifically, it would make the most sense to remove "plugins are disabled", > and add a sentence saying that the UA has to only allow plugins to run if it > knows they'll meet these requirements. E.g., NPAPI might be extended to have > flags to signal this sort of thing, or maybe the browsers authors control the > plugin themselves (like the Chrome PDF viewer). +1 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 20:02:42 UTC