- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:18:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12465 Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-07-15 19:18:00 UTC --- If the poster frame is displayed in some browsers but not others once the video starts loading, they'll be forced to hack around it by superimposing an <img> or burning a poster into the first frame of the video. This defeats the entire point of the feature. If something is visually part of the page contents, authors absolutely need to be able to control it reliably. Authors are not going to accept "the poster frame I've carefully selected displays in some browsers until the user hits play, and in others it disappears almost immediately and is replaced by the first frame". This isn't UI at all. UI differences are where the same basic thing is displayed to the user, but in a UA-specific manner. Here we're talking about two totally different things being displayed to the user: the poster and the first frame. There's no reason not to demand interop here. I don't get your last sentence at all. We're talking about a case where no one has started playing the video at all. What does starting and immediately stopping it have to do with anything? Once the video has started playing, the poster shouldn't display anymore, as the spec says: "the poster frame should not be shown again after a frame of video has been shown." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 19:18:03 UTC