- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:23:04 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13253 --- Comment #1 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2011-07-14 16:23:03 UTC --- Proposed resolution: 1) When a Change Proposal covers multiple separable changes, during review the Chairs suggest (but do not necessarily mandate) splitting the Change Proposal into one per change and splitting the issue in a corresponding way. D) If a Change Proposal author is unwilling to split, and feels the changes are all-or-nothing, then the Chairs treat it that way. If *any* part of a compound Change Proposal (where a split was recommended) is found to draw stronger objections than the alternative, the whole Change Proposal is rejected. We do that instead of issuing a split decision. E) If two compound Change Proposals, where in each case the Chairs recommended a split, are up against each other, and one part of one draws weaker objections, and another part of the other draw weaker objections, they both fail. If these are the only Change Proposals, the issue is closed without prejudice. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2011 16:23:09 UTC