- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:20:22 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13169 Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com Platform|Other |All Summary|Why aren't placeholders |WF2: Allow placeholder on |available on Date/Time |date/time fields for legacy |fields? It seems to me they |browsers |should. | OS/Version|other |All Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-07-07 17:20:21 UTC --- Related to bug 12868. Bug 12781 comment 1 is relevant. The question is, are there going to be a significant number of browsers around that support placeholder but not date/time inputs? If we expect that all such browsers will be gone within a year or two, it doesn't seem worth allowing this. On the other hand, it's harmless in browsers that do support the type. I think it makes sense to allow attributes like maxlength and placeholder on all the new input types for now, and say that browsers must ignore them if they actually support the type. It would be fallback content for legacy browsers, like the contents of <video> or whatever. In a few years we can revisit and make them obsolete, once there's no reason to use them anymore. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 17:20:23 UTC