- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:09:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9097
Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Depends on| |9711
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #4 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-07-04 10:09:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Rationale: Is that really equivalent in all cases? I'd rather just leave it up
> to prose unless that really does match all cases correctly.
Though browsers are extremely buggy and uneven w.r.t. how they implement - or
*whether* they implemnent <wbr>, the answer is yes, it *is* equivalent in all
cases: normal, pre, nowrap, pre-wrap and pre-line. Test page:
http://malform.no/testing/html5/nobr
The test page shows that unless the browser has a genereal bug in its CSS
generated content support *or* a bug in its implementation of Zero Width Space
character, then the proposed wbr{content:"\00200B"} matches reality.
Caveat: I disagree that <wbr> should have any effect inside white-space:pre and
white-space:nowrap.
(In reply to comment #0)
> Add wbr { content: "\200B"; } (ZWSP)?
+1 But you forgot two zeroes: wbr{content:"\00200B"}
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think it doesn't make a difference (for Opera/WebKit) in the normal case
Your statement is incorrect, with regard to Opera. The proposed style (see
above) does work very well with Opera. Not only does it work well in Opera: if
we change the selector from wbr{} to wbr:before{}, then it also works very well
in IE8. Test case for white-space:normal:
http://malform.no/testing/html5/nobr#normal
> and doesn't do what's desired inside <nobr>.
Test case: http://malform.no/testing/html5/nobr#nowrap
IE-in-quirks mode, IE6, IE7, Webkit and Konqueror do *not* define the desired
behavior. The desired behaviour is defined by Firefox 5, IE8, IE9 and Opera.
See bug 9711 (see 5th comment).
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 July 2011 10:09:30 UTC