- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:09:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9097 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Depends on| |9711 Resolution|NEEDSINFO | --- Comment #4 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-07-04 10:09:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Rationale: Is that really equivalent in all cases? I'd rather just leave it up > to prose unless that really does match all cases correctly. Though browsers are extremely buggy and uneven w.r.t. how they implement - or *whether* they implemnent <wbr>, the answer is yes, it *is* equivalent in all cases: normal, pre, nowrap, pre-wrap and pre-line. Test page: http://malform.no/testing/html5/nobr The test page shows that unless the browser has a genereal bug in its CSS generated content support *or* a bug in its implementation of Zero Width Space character, then the proposed wbr{content:"\00200B"} matches reality. Caveat: I disagree that <wbr> should have any effect inside white-space:pre and white-space:nowrap. (In reply to comment #0) > Add wbr { content: "\200B"; } (ZWSP)? +1 But you forgot two zeroes: wbr{content:"\00200B"} (In reply to comment #2) > I think it doesn't make a difference (for Opera/WebKit) in the normal case Your statement is incorrect, with regard to Opera. The proposed style (see above) does work very well with Opera. Not only does it work well in Opera: if we change the selector from wbr{} to wbr:before{}, then it also works very well in IE8. Test case for white-space:normal: http://malform.no/testing/html5/nobr#normal > and doesn't do what's desired inside <nobr>. Test case: http://malform.no/testing/html5/nobr#nowrap IE-in-quirks mode, IE6, IE7, Webkit and Konqueror do *not* define the desired behavior. The desired behaviour is defined by Firefox 5, IE8, IE9 and Opera. See bug 9711 (see 5th comment). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 July 2011 10:09:30 UTC