- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 05:55:44 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10342 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |a11y Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-07-04 05:55:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: I think bug 9350 indicated that there are use cases for this and > that it is widely used, while the costs of allowing it are minimal. So I don't > see much value in dropping it. Nobody is forced to use it, indeed using ­ > is perfectly fine too. * I sharte Rouven's concerns. * My comment in Bug 9350 questions that there is any use case - there are only bad and misundestood implementations: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9350#c8 * In particular, browsers vary to a high degree: Bug 9711, in particular comment 2: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9711#c2 * In fact, <wbr> should not only become obsolete - it should also only have effect at all in quirks mode: Bug 13120. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 July 2011 05:55:45 UTC