- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 05:55:44 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10342
Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |a11y
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #3 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-07-04 05:55:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: I think bug 9350 indicated that there are use cases for this and
> that it is widely used, while the costs of allowing it are minimal. So I don't
> see much value in dropping it. Nobody is forced to use it, indeed using ­
> is perfectly fine too.
* I sharte Rouven's concerns.
* My comment in Bug 9350 questions that there is any use case - there are only
bad and misundestood implementations:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9350#c8
* In particular, browsers vary to a high degree: Bug 9711, in particular
comment 2: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9711#c2
* In fact, <wbr> should not only become obsolete - it should also only have
effect at all in quirks mode: Bug 13120.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 July 2011 05:55:45 UTC