- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:07:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12151 --- Comment #4 from Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@gmail.com> 2011-02-22 23:07:35 UTC --- I would be fine with that too but I'm wondering how is that more consistent? I mean, is there anything similar in HTML/CSS specs? The closest thing I see is :valid/:invalid but we can't really use it for consistency because of setCustomValidity() that can make any element invalid. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 23:07:37 UTC