- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:42:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11754 Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com> 2011-02-12 00:42:02 UTC --- The Editor's Draft of 11 February states the following in the Introduction: ]] All web content need not be authored in polyglot markup. Polyglot markup is ideal for publishing when there's a strong desire to serve both HMTL and XML tool chains without simultaneously having to maintain dual copies of the content: one in HTML and a second in XHTML. In addition, a single polyglot markup output requires less infrastructure to produce than to produce both HTML and XHTML output for the same content. Polyglot markup is also be beneficial when lightweight processes—such as quick testing or even hand-authoring—are applied to content intended to be published both as HTML and XHTML, especially if that content is not sent through a tool chain. [[ I believe that this fulfills the requirements of this bug and so I have resolved it. Thanks for your help, Eliot -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 12 February 2011 00:42:04 UTC