- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:19:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13348
Stephen von Takach <steve@advancedcontrol.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Disagree, needsReview
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #5 from Stephen von Takach <steve@advancedcontrol.com.au> 2011-08-16 07:19:11 UTC ---
What additional information do you need?
>From my perspective the iframe sandbox doesn't go far enough if browsers are
not ignoring X-Frame-Options on sandboxed content.
Browser developers should be confident that click-jacking is preventable when
using a sandbox under certain conditions.
I believe, in this context, there is enough of a case for extending the
functionality of the sandbox attribute.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 07:19:13 UTC