- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:07:02 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13478 Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-08-02 16:07:01 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: HTML relies on many other specifications and registries, and the practice is well accepted in the standards world. For instance, HTML requires that lang attribute values be valid according to BCP47, which in turn defers to an IANA registry. It is not practical to include all registries in HTML proper. If poorly-written regulations require organizations to conform to particular versions of standards, without allowance for revisions to those standards over time, that's something that has to be fixed in the regulations. We are not responsible for people who use our standards in ways they aren't intended to be used. Authoring conformance requirements are designed to inform authors of possible errors and encourage them to voluntarily fix their pages -- they aren't meant to be mandatory. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 16:07:03 UTC