[Bug 13490] New: Section 2.2.1, Conformance Classes: Conformance Checkers has an awkwardly worded sentence

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13490

           Summary: Section 2.2.1, Conformance Classes: Conformance
                    Checkers has an awkwardly worded sentence
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: kelly.ford@microsoft.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org, kelly.ford@microsoft.com


Current:

(This is only a "SHOULD" and not a "MUST" requirement because it has been
proven to be impossible. [COMPUTABLE])

Proposed:

This is only a SHOULD and not a MUST requirement because exhaustive and
complete testing of all failure cases would be impossible.

Reason:
If such a requirement is completely impossible, the requirement should likely
not exist. The proposed wording better reflects the nature of such a
requirement.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 02:47:16 UTC