- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:35:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12495
Summary: please mark the reference to RFC1345 as non-normative
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: julian.reschke@gmx.de
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Citing the decision for ISSUE-101 in
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0302.html>:
"As such, we found the objection to referencing a for-pay document
stronger than the objection to referencing RFC 1345, even if the RFC
does not provide a normative definition for ASCII."
So it seems the decision was based on the assumption that RFC 1345 is not used
as normative reference. However, it is.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:35:59 UTC