- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:35:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12495 Summary: please mark the reference to RFC1345 as non-normative Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: julian.reschke@gmx.de QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Citing the decision for ISSUE-101 in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0302.html>: "As such, we found the objection to referencing a for-pay document stronger than the objection to referencing RFC 1345, even if the RFC does not provide a normative definition for ASCII." So it seems the decision was based on the assumption that RFC 1345 is not used as normative reference. However, it is. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:35:59 UTC