- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:12:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12425 --- Comment #6 from Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> 2011-04-07 13:12:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Any UI expectations for media fragments that apply to <video>/<audio> should > also apply to viewing the media file in its own tab, or indeed retrieving a > media file from a URL using a non-browser UA -- right? Why is the HTML spec > the right place to put this sort of thing? > > I just opened the default movie player on Ubuntu and immediately found an "Open > Location..." option that would let me view media from a URL. The authors of > that application presumably would have no reason to care about HTML or <video>, > only about the semantics of media fragments. Why should they have to look in > the HTML spec to find out how they're expected to display URLs with media > fragments? This should be in the media fragment spec. Aryeh, your use case is dealt with at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/#media-fragment-display (in the Media Fragment spec). Don't you have the answer of your question there? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 13:13:00 UTC