- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:57:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12427 --- Comment #13 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-04-07 07:57:31 UTC --- My concern with supporting #xywh for still images is that it would require rewriting code all over the place (<img>, CSS backgrounds/borders) that previously used the physical size of the image to also consider the fragment size. This is of course possible, but it's really a question if it's worth the implementation cost (and future bugs) to support these use cases, which IMO are rather marginal. If HTTP pipelining were completely inadequate, I'd have expected to see JavaScript libraries to work around this using CSS or canvas in common use. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 07:57:37 UTC