W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > April 2011

[Bug 12427] User interface of spatial media fragment URI in <img> or <video> resource, or in browser navigation

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:52:28 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Q7SDk-0006up-Uj@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12427

--- Comment #8 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2011-04-06 12:52:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> What about the percent syntax #xywh=percent:25,25,50,50 ? If that does not map
> to a integer number of pixels, should rounding be applied and in which
> direction?

That should probably go into the media fragment spec. Good point to make - I
would say always round up.

> I presume that videoWidth and videoHeight should also reflect the cropped
> dimensions, so the question applies there as well.

Yes, indeed, so that has to go into the HTML spec (or at least refer to the
media frag spec).

> I note also in passing that if Opera implements support for Media Fragment,
> there's no plan for supporting the xywh syntax, as you can already achieve
> cropping with CSS. If there are compelling use cases where CSS doesn't do a
> good job, then I might reconsider, of course.

Link below has a use case..


(In reply to comment #3)
> Note: related earlier discussion
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010May/0061.html

Sorry, I meant this one:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/027581.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 12:52:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:08 UTC