[Bug 12432] New: Would it be fair to say that making html5 documentation available in a convenient compressed archive would not be such a difficult task for a great big organization like w3c? And wouldn't it also be fair to say that even the famous w3c has a lame web serv

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12432

           Summary: Would it be fair to say that making html5
                    documentation available in a convenient compressed
                    archive would not be such a difficult task for a great
                    big organization like w3c? And wouldn't it also be
                    fair to say that even the famous w3c has a lame web
                    serv
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/Overview.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top

Comment:
Would it be fair to say that making html5 documentation available in a
convenient compressed archive would not be such a difficult task for a great
big organization like w3c?

And wouldn't it also be fair to say that even the famous w3c has a lame web
server content that cannot even detect the presence of javascript in a
standard browsewr such as SeaMonkey?  Shame on w3c!

Posted from: 27.33.225.88
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 04:02:46 UTC