- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:08:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-30 09:08:13 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: IE doesn't support <rb> (it ignores it) and in practice many pages
don't actually use it (the HTML definition of ruby was based on extensive
research for real use of ruby markup in the wild). While there is a short-term
cost to dropping the <rb> element from the content model, there is a long-term
win since the element is essentially useless in practice.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 09:08:14 UTC