W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:35:02 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P1FXa-0000J0-NR@jessica.w3.org>

fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.ne
                   |                            |t
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |

--- Comment #2 from fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net> 2010-09-30 09:35:02 UTC ---
In addition to the markup compatibility concerns raised above, there's another
one: that having an <rb> element allows styling of the ruby base text
independently of the ruby text. This is needed for example to control line
breaking: depending on type of ruby contents and on the styling of the
document, line breaking may or may not be allowed at otherwise-valid
breakpoints in the ruby base text.

I agree that in the general case, the markup is much simpler if ruby bases are
implied by the <rt> markup. However, in some cases it is necessary to have a
more concrete element to address.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 09:35:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:25 UTC