- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:28:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10838 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2010-09-30 08:28:58 UTC --- It seem to me the (In reply to comment #1) > If we introduced <u> with the semantic "proper name mark", it would just be > used incorrectly by everyone. So doing that would be bad. What concrete badness would ensue? It seems to me that it's backwards to value theoretical purity (it's wrong as a matter of principle to use presentational markup without citing how people would concretely suffer) to override a pragmatic i18n/author concern (that it's easier to underline Chinese characters using <u> than using combining diacritical marks). Reopening. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 08:29:05 UTC