- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:13:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10838 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-30 07:13:13 UTC --- The diacritic is ̲. I don't really see why we would want to use <u> to indicate that the text should be italicised... if you want to indicate that the text should be italicised, use the appropriate markup for the reason it's italicised, and then use CSS to italicise it. No pointer to my thoughts, they're just thoughts, sorry! When I say I've been thinking about this a long time I mean it literally. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I maintain that there is a difference between <u>'s use cases and <b>/<i>/<s>/<small>/etc. The others aren't actually defined in terms of their rendering, and yet have very solid and common use cases (<b> for keywords, <i> for alternate voices or terms, <s> for irrelevant or inaccurate text, <small> for legalese, etc) that actually match how they are commonly used in pages where people aren't just abusing HTML as a presentational language. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 07:13:15 UTC