- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:31:58 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10331 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-28 23:31:57 UTC --- usemap isn't defined to take a URL, it's defined to take valid hash-name reference. That seems quite clear. form.action is a URL (this is intentionally not like non-IE browsers, since IE's behaviour makes more sense). The legacy ones are all plain text (not URLs), since none are defined to be URLs. This is explicitly stated for body.background for some reason, but it's true for all the others as well. I would really rather not go through marking all the URL-reflecting IDL attributes explicitly, since that's just a huge pain and I'm bound to make mistakes, both in doing it and later in maintaining it. I'd accept a patch against the "source" file, though, if you feel strongly about this and want to do it. Feel free to contact me on IRC if you need help with that. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Spec seems well-defined as is. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 23:32:00 UTC