[Bug 10410] On getting, should the UA percent-decode document.location.hash? It's not clear.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10410

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch,
                   |                            |w3c@adambarth.com

--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-28 23:22:48 UTC ---
Is this relating just to the behaviour of location.hash and
HTMLAnchorElement.hash, or is this relating to UA behaviour for jumping to the
fragid? The UA behaviour is quite complex, and described here:

  
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#the-indicated-part-of-the-document

Per spec, there's nothing to decode, as described here:

   http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#dom-uda-hash

I can add an example to the table below that if that would help.

cc'ing Adam as he might be respeccing the API here into some other document
that HTML will then reference.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 23:22:51 UTC