- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:18:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11057
David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #4 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2010-10-29 21:18:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The purpose of the about:legacy-compat value is to allow documents to be
> created using XSLT. It’s highly likely that developers will want to create
> polyglot docs using XSLT, and so guidance about this is necessary.
>
> Thank you very much for the feedback.
>
> Eliot
This comment doesn't address the issue.
If you use xsl:output to add a doctype then XSLT gives absolutely no assurance
that the resulting document is well formed, and the subject of this bug is my
belief that if you specify about:legacy-compat that the resulting document is
not in fact well formed.
I agree that guidance is necessary but question whether it is advisable to
recommend that non well formed documents be passed to an XML parser.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 21:18:58 UTC