- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:31:58 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10828
Adil <adil@diwan.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |adil@diwan.com
--- Comment #18 from Adil <adil@diwan.com> 2010-10-20 21:31:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> If this request is just to change the <br> element's definition to match IE,
> then that is definitely something we can do. Should I just change the spec to
> instead say "A br element must separate paragraphs for the purposes of the
> Unicode bidirectional algorithm. [BIDI]" ?
I would like to see <br> defined as paragraph separator by default. However,
this alone does not solve a specific use case that affects my work. I am
developing a web app that displays text extracted from a book or a newspaper in
a similar way to this site:
http://newspapers.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/1118868.
The requirement is to match exactly the line breaks in the original document
regardless of the font width. The problem is, for mixed rtl-ltr text, I need to
insert a line break that is not a bidi paragraph break.
If <br> is redefined as a bidi paragraph break instead of a line-break then, in
this case, the <br> will give the wrong reordering for the broken line.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 21:32:04 UTC