- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:24:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11011 Vegard Larsen <vegard@xaltra.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |TrackerRequest Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #11 from Vegard Larsen <vegard@xaltra.net> 2010-10-19 06:24:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Do we even know if this is something that TC39 is working on? Is anyone here > prepared to bring forward such a proposal to them? > > Just want to make sure that we're not relying on a purely theoretical feature. There are no current (public) proposals of this nature on the TC39 wiki. There are however other extensions/changes to the regular expression syntax being discussed: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:extend_regexps http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=discussion:extend_regexps I feel it is important to reiterate that this issue only arises because we are using partial regular expressions for the pattern attribute. Explaining how to match a word (or worse, a sentence) case-insensitively to someone with little experience with regular expressions would be immensely complicated with the draft as is. Not even to mention how cumbersome it would be to implement something like "type this sentence to let us know you really want to do this" that is common for digital signatures in some places. I am escalating this issue to the WG. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 06:24:50 UTC