- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:14:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 --- Comment #56 from Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> 2010-10-14 08:14:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #53) > > So, probably this is better: > > <video src="video.ogv" poster="image.png" alt="Ian Hickson - editor of > HTML5 spec" aria-label="a video about HTML5" controls> > </video> Sorry for the typo, I meant: <video src="video.ogv" poster="image.png" posteralt="Ian Hickson - editor of HTML5 spec" aria-label="a video about HTML5" controls> </video> or alternatively <video src="video.ogv" poster="image.png" posteralt="Ian Hickson - editor of HTML5 spec" alt="a video about HTML5" controls> </video> Use of @alt for an alternative short description of the video is common for other elements, so we shouldn't break that here. I've also briefly spoken with a blind person who is doing development on screen readers and they thought it reasonable to have two alt texts, one for the video and one for the poster, since they provide potentially differing information (if the poster is available). But it was accepted as a pedantic difference and unsure if it would be worth the effort. Maybe it would be possible to encourage users to explain the poster content in the @alt attribute, too, e.g. <video src="video.ogv" poster="image.png" alt="a video about HTML5, poster showing Ian Hickson - editor of HTML5 spec" controls> </video> We do, however, need to agree on what the attribute is for alternative short description for video - is it @alt or is it @aria-label - or something completely different? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 08:15:00 UTC