- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:16:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mjs@apple.com --- Comment #34 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2010-10-12 20:15:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: > > > > Status: Rejected > > Change Description: no spec change > > Rationale: DRM is evil. > > I respect the editor's right to have a personal opinion on the political > aspects of DRM, but that is not a technical response. > > Is there a technical reason why HTML5 cannot support a form of DRM? > I understand the desire of some content providers to have DRM. But I think DRM, by nature, cannot be specified by an open standard. Openly publishing DRM format information allows it to be trivially broken, as you cannot obfuscate what you are doing when there is a published specification for it. This is why existing DRM schemes involve secret information about how the DRM mechanism works. HTML5 could say something about proprietary DRM schemes that might be embedded in the media format itself, but it's not really clear if anything like that is useful at the HTML level. Another possibility is to add some opt-in trivial barriers to casual piracy, such as a "no save" flag. This would put a small stumbling block in the way of casual piracy but would do nothing to determine anyone who is even slightly determined. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 20:16:05 UTC