- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:32:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10355 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-10-12 19:32:30 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Ok. I'm going to punt on this for now. Let's revisit it when we have test suites and there's momentum behind getting a bunch of browsers to 100% compliance. If we remove things, it means some browsers will have to remove them as well, don't forget. So either way browsers will have to change. I think we'll get the least resistance here to adding features, at least if they're just IDL reflection. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:32:35 UTC