- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:41:50 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10954 --- Comment #8 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2010-10-12 09:41:50 UTC --- Thanks for adding the consideration for "flowed". That being said; I'm still not convinced that specifying the DOM at this level of detail even for future variants of text/plain makes sense. If an author augments the type information like that, he/she clearly *want* different processing, and are very unlikely to care about a modified DOM. Also, making this a CSS issue is a nice idea; I wonder whether you talked to any of the implementers whether they're willing to do that? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 09:41:51 UTC