- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:12:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10954 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |ian@hixie.ch Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-10-11 22:12:27 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: This was already implicitly supported, but I've added a note and some more text to make it clearer that the spec is not trying to contradict those other RFCs. > I'm very surprised that anybody is interested in the DOM generated for text/plain This actually turns out to be surprisingly common (enough that UAs have to be interoperable on the handling of short text files in iframes). I highly recommend working as QA for a browser vendor for a couple of years, it is quite enlightening. :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 11 October 2010 22:12:30 UTC