- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:33:00 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10920
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-10-07 21:33:00 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale:
There are two issues here:
1. Whether there should be a registry mechanism for this extension point,
2. If so, what that registry mechanism should be.
With respect to the first issue, a registry is needed in order to provide
validation tools with the information required to flag typos and other mistakes
in the use of this extension point.
With respect to the second issue, I would be happy to reference whatever
registration mechanism ends up being the one that implementations (validators
in particular, in this case) consider canonical. This is essentially a case
where "the market will decide"; the solution, if the current reference is not
desirable, is to provide a competitive alternative.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2010 21:33:02 UTC